Mount Peake Project
Notice of Intent - Mount Peake; Statement of Reasons - Mount Peake; Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - Mount Peake; Notice of Intent variation - Mount Peake; Draft EIS - Mount Peake; Addendum to Draft EIS - Mount Peake; Supplement to Draft EIS - Mount Peake
GHD Pty Ltd; Animal Plant Mineral Pty Ltd; Australian Museum Consulting
Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority
E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT
TNG Ltd, under wholly owned subsidiary Enigma Mining Limited, is proposing to develop and operate the Mt Peake Project, a polymetallic (titanium, vanadium, iron) mine, located approximately 235 km north-northwest of Alice Springs in the Northern Territory (NT). GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) has been engaged by TNG to prepare the NOI and to progress environmental baseline studies and any approvals documentation for the Project.
Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).
Mount Peake Project Notice of Intent - NOI June 2013 -- Mount Peake Statement of Reasons - SOR November 2013 -- Mount Peake Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - TOR March 2013 -- Mount Peake Notice of Intent variation - NOI Variation March 2015 -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 1 - Draft EIS February 2016 -- Assessment Report 85 -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 2 Appendices A - K Draft -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 3 Appendix L-O - Draft -- Mount Peake Project Addendum to Draft EIS Appendix 1-10 -- Mount Peake Project Supplement to Draft EIS - April 2017 -- Mount Peake Project Addendum to the Draft EIS - November 2017
Environmental impact statement; Environmental assessment; Iron mines and mining; Environmental aspects
Volumes : colour illustrations, colour maps ; 30 cm.
https://www.tngltd.com.au/project/mount-peake-v-ti-fe/ [Mount Peake V Ti Fe - TNG Limited]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396300 [Mount Peake Project Notice of Intent - NOI June 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396301 [Mount Peake Statement of Reasons - SOR November 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396303 [Mount Peake Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - TOR March 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396305 [Mount Peake Notice of Intent variation - NOI Variation March 2015]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396307 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 1 - Draft EIS February 2016]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396309 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 2 Appendices A - K Draft]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396311 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 3 Appendix L-O - Draft]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396314 [Mount Peake Project Supplement to Draft EIS - April 2017]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396315 [Mount Peake Project Addendum to the Draft EIS - November 2017]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396317 [Mount Peake Project Addendum to Draft EIS Appendix 1-10]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396319 [Assessment Report 85]
https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396300; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396301; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396303; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396305; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396307; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396309; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396311; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396314; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396315; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396319
TNG LTD MOUNT PEAKE PROJECT Page | 28 Table 5-1: Factors that may influence the presence of BTM and data to be recorded during transect searches. Site Covariate Predicted response Measurement Vegetation cover BTM are not restricted to habitat containing Triodia (Pavey et al. 2011), however reduced cover is likely to increase predation making long-term populations persistence unsustainable (Krtner et al. 2007). Given the presence of a number of predator species at the site, cover is likely to increase probability of BTM occupancy. Record the percentage ground cover strata: tussock/hummock (Triodia spp) and shrubs (Grevillea/Hakea) using aerial imagery/ground-truthing. Fire Age The fire age structure of the habitat can influence productivity and food resource availability. Some portions are always of unsuitable fire age either too young or too old (Dickman et al. 2011). Record time since last fire event within transect (years). Soil Composition BTM have been shown to preference habitat on sand plain/sandy swale and gibber plain habitat type (Pavey et al. 2011). Measure % of transect that intersects Gibber plain and Sand plain habitat. Slope BTM have shown to preference gently sloping to flat topographic positions (Pavey et al. 2011). Measure the % slope of the transect. Rainfall Temporal variance in observations of BTM has shown to correlate with rainfall variability (Dickman et al. 2001), which implies the role of resource pulses. Record rainfall (mm) that has occurred since the time of previous survey. 5.7 FURTHER MONITORING The transects searched in September/October 2017 (see Figure 3-2a BTM: Biodiversity survey transects searched in the Borefields Corridor area during the September/October 2017 survey, b and c) are to be resurveyed annually at the same or a similar time of the year when conditions are suitable for BTM. It is important to note that multi-season, in the context of occupancy modelling, does not mean monitoring multiple times a year in different seasons. It means that each modelling evet is undertaken independently of another (i.e. in a different period) and in this instance refers to survey events being undertaken annually.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.
We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
Click on Related items to view images, documents, etc. associated with this item.
You are welcome to provide further information or feedback about this item by emailing TerritoryStories@nt.gov.au