Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10070/303196
Note: the high definition versions of some images are not available online, but may be Ordered
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Little, Siobhan C-
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Grant J-
dc.contributor.authorBowman, David MJS-
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, Peter I-
dc.contributor.authorBrook, Barry W-
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, Corey J-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T04:36:22Z-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-04T22:19:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-29T04:36:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-04T22:19:19Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10070/303196-
dc.description.abstractMicrobial and insect-growth-regulator larvicides dominate current vector control programmes because they reduce larval abundance and are relatively environmentally benign. However, their short persistence makes them expensive,and environmental manipulation of larval habitat might be an alternative control measure. Aedes vigilax is a major vector species in northern Australia. A field experiment was implemented in Darwin, Australia, to test the hypotheses that (1) aerial microbial larvicide application effectively decreases Ae. vigilax larval presence, and therefore adult emergence, and (2) environmental manipulation is an effective alternative control measure. Generalised linear and mixed-effects modelling and information theoretic comparisons were used to test these hypotheses. RESULTS: It is shown that the current aerial larvicide application campaign is effective at suppressing the emergence of Ae. vigilax, whereas vegetation removal is not as effective in this context. In addition, the results indicate that current larval sampling procedures are inadequate for quantifying larval abundance or adult emergence. CONCLUSIONS: This field-based comparison has shown that the existing larviciding campaign is more effective than a simple environmental management strategy for mosquito control. It has also identified an important knowledge gap in the use of larval sampling to evaluate the effectiveness of vector control strategies. c 2011 Society of Chemical Industryen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSociety of Chemical Industryen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPest Management Science;Vol. 68, No. 5-
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectNorthern Territoryen
dc.subjectInsectsen
dc.subjectMosquitoesen
dc.subjectInsecticidesen
dc.subjectDarwinen
dc.subjectDisease vectorsen
dc.subjectVector controlen
dc.subjectSurveysen
dc.subjectPrevention and controlen
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.titleExperimental comparison of aerial larvicides and habitat modification for controlling disease carrying Aedes vigilax mosquitoesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.relation.incollectionDept of Health Digital Library
dc.relation.incommunityE-Books
dc.view.styleebooks
dc.kohastatus.transfertokohayesen
local.identifier.bitstream10070/366568|90f12699-dc47-4be7-9379-1b89aca15887en
local.sourceNTLen
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Digital Library

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Click this link to access the article.docx0 BMicrosoft WordView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Territory Stories are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.