The Supreme Court of Australia Transcript of Proceedings Between Peter Julian Hansen (Plaintiff) and Northern Land Council (Defendant) pages 52-117
Tabled paper 807
Tabled Papers for 8th Assembly 1997 - 2001; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT
Tabledby Shane Stone
Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
facts, information, analysing it and putting it together in a sensible and, hopefully, powerful way - - What information were you given - - - ?---Well, I was only given - - - - - for the purposes of this test?---I was only given the fact that there would be a shortfall in the budget and that the amount sought was $500,000. Were you given any other information other than that?---No, it was only the written mock-up briefing. And you then prepared a written response, is that what happened?---That's correct. Now, if I could just ask you to have a look at documents 20 and 21, to yourself please? Firstly, does document 20 comprise a type-up of the interview?---I didn't see this document but I assume that that's the case. Right. Now, in relation to document 21, is that a document that you've seen before or not?---This - yes, I think this^is exactly what was given to me for the practical test. Is that'the application you were asked to make? Is that - - - ?----This is the information that I was provided to produce the - the practical test, the letter to the minister, the submission seeking an extra $500,000. Now, there doesn't appear to be a statement, so far as I can see, in that document about a specific amount of $500,000? --- That was a verbal addition. So, in other words, 'Here, Peter, is what we want you to write about and the sum that w eve got in mind is $500,000.' Now, in the ordinary course of things, if we look at the structure of this memorandum, i ts headed, of course, 'Interview exercise only1. It's from 'DSOl Director', I take it in your situation, as matters transpired, that would be Mr Dodson?---Yes. ~ And DS02, that would be yourself if you subsequently were to get the position?---Yes. Now, following this meeting, were you telephonedby Mr Dodson on about 2 December 1992?---Yes, I was. Could you tell His Honour what was discussed, if anything, between you and Mr Dodson on 2 December 1992 please? ---Mr Dodson called me and he said that he'd had a lengthy conversation with my former boss, Senator Geitzel. The conversation had gone for about 40 minutes or so, that he'd 5/ld H a n s e n 58 P.J. H A N S E N X N 1 8 / 1 1 / 9 8