Territory Stories

Mount Peake Project

Details:

Title

Mount Peake Project

Other title

Notice of Intent - Mount Peake; Statement of Reasons - Mount Peake; Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - Mount Peake; Notice of Intent variation - Mount Peake; Draft EIS - Mount Peake; Addendum to Draft EIS - Mount Peake; Supplement to Draft EIS - Mount Peake

Creator

GHD Pty Ltd; Animal Plant Mineral Pty Ltd; Australian Museum Consulting

Issued by

Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT

Date

2013-06-01

Abstract

TNG Ltd, under wholly owned subsidiary Enigma Mining Limited, is proposing to develop and operate the Mt Peake Project, a polymetallic (titanium, vanadium, iron) mine, located approximately 235 km north-northwest of Alice Springs in the Northern Territory (NT). GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) has been engaged by TNG to prepare the NOI and to progress environmental baseline studies and any approvals documentation for the Project.

Notes

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

Mount Peake Project Notice of Intent - NOI June 2013 -- Mount Peake Statement of Reasons - SOR November 2013 -- Mount Peake Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - TOR March 2013 -- Mount Peake Notice of Intent variation - NOI Variation March 2015 -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 1 - Draft EIS February 2016 -- Assessment Report 85 -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 2 Appendices A - K Draft -- Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 3 Appendix L-O - Draft -- Mount Peake Project Addendum to Draft EIS Appendix 1-10 -- Mount Peake Project Supplement to Draft EIS - April 2017 -- Mount Peake Project Addendum to the Draft EIS - November 2017

Language

English

Subject

Environmental impact statement; Environmental assessment; Iron mines and mining; Environmental aspects

Publisher name

TNG Limited

Place of publication

Subiaco

Format

Volumes : colour illustrations, colour maps ; 30 cm.

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

TNG Limited

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Related links

https://www.tngltd.com.au/project/mount-peake-v-ti-fe/ [Mount Peake V Ti Fe - TNG Limited]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396300 [Mount Peake Project Notice of Intent - NOI June 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396301 [Mount Peake Statement of Reasons - SOR November 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396303 [Mount Peake Terms of Reference for the preparation of an EIS - TOR March 2013]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396305 [Mount Peake Notice of Intent variation - NOI Variation March 2015]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396307 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 1 - Draft EIS February 2016]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396309 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 2 Appendices A - K Draft]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396311 [Mount Peake Project Draft EIS Vol. 3 Appendix L-O - Draft]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396314 [Mount Peake Project Supplement to Draft EIS - April 2017]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396315 [Mount Peake Project Addendum to the Draft EIS - November 2017]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396317 [Mount Peake Project Addendum to Draft EIS Appendix 1-10]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396319 [Assessment Report 85]

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/294504

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396317

Related items

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396300; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396301; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396303; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396305; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396307; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396309; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396311; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396314; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396315; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/396319

Page content

No. COMMITMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TIMEFRAME LOCATION 309. Through the detailed design phase of the Project TNG will look to avoid impacts to Aboriginal sites or areas of archaeological sensitivity. Cultural Heritage Management Plan Archaeological surveys Stakeholder Consultation Register Pre-production Draft EIS Ch11 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage p14 310. Where impacts to sites are unavoidable, artefact recording and relocation will be undertaken to fully record the condition, extent and significance of artefact sites along the Hanson River and in the Central Mount Stuart/Dijilbari Hills foothills. Cultural Heritage Management Plan Compliance with Heritage Act EMS/ Record keeping Stakeholder Consultation Register Construction/ Operations Draft EIS Ch11 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage p14 311. TNG will lodge a Works Approval application form with the Heritage Branch to allow further archaeological excavations, in accordance with section 72 of the Heritage Act. Stakeholder Consultation Register Approved Works Approval Compliance with Heritage Act Construction/ Operations Draft EIS Ch11 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage p14 312. TNG will comply with the conditions set in Sacred Site Clearance Certificate SSCC2015-034 and SSCC2015-169. Audits/ Inspections Construction/ Operations Draft EIS Ch11 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage p14 313. All staff working on the Project will be made aware of the statutory obligations relating to historic and Aboriginal cultural heritage. Training/ Inductions Construction/ Operations Draft EIS Ch11 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage p14 314. The management of sacred sites will be undertaken in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan. Cultural Heritage Management Plan Audits/ Inspections Construction/ Operations Draft EIS App N Environmental MP p20 315. Where impacts are unavoidable, artefact recording and relocation, and archaeological excavations will be undertaken to fully record the condition, extent and significance of the sites. Compliance with Heritage Act Cultural Heritage Management Plan Stakeholder Consultation Register Social Impact Management Plan Construction/ Operations Draft EIS - Ch5 Environmental Risk Assessment p46 316. Works Approval Application lodged with the Heritage Branch to allow for archaeological works within the Project area including artefact recording and relocation, and archaeological excavations, in accordance with section 72 of the Heritage Act. Compliance with Heritage Act Cultural Heritage Management Plan EMS/ Record keeping Construction/ Operations Draft EIS - Ch5 Environmental Risk Assessment p46 317. Clearly demarcate (including additional buffer zone) in field, areas of significance) Compliance with Heritage Act Cultural Heritage Management Plan Ground Disturbance Procedures Construction/ Operations Draft EIS - Ch5 Environmental Risk Assessment p46 318. Modify the location of project infrastructure to avoid impacts to sacred sites. Compliance with Heritage Act Audits/ Inspections Ground Disturbance Procedures Cultural Heritage Management Plan Pre-production Draft EIS - Ch5 Environmental Risk Assessment p46 319. Create no-go areas where required. Compliance with Heritage Act Ground Disturbance Procedures Cultural Heritage Management Plan Pre-production Draft EIS - Ch5 Environmental Risk Assessment p46


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.