Territory Stories

Submission Sessional Committee on the Use and Abuse of Alcohol by the Community 051 Pitjantjatjara Council Inc

Details:

Title

Submission Sessional Committee on the Use and Abuse of Alcohol by the Community 051 Pitjantjatjara Council Inc

Other title

Tabled Paper 271

Collection

Tabled Papers for 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT

Date

1991-05-09

Description

Tabled by Eric Poole

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00044

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/293433

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/397589

Page content

would not have arisen under the Liquor Act. His Honour perceived that injustice would follow unless he adopted a construction of which he thought the Ordinance was susceptible and that would obviate that injustice. He said: "I find it difficult to accept the proposition that the holder of a licence can be forced into the position of applying for a grant of an original licence, not a renewal, by force of circumstances beyond his control, for example, pressure of court business. If the intention of the legislation was to cause his licence to terminate on the expiration of 14 days after the third Tuesday in March one would expect to find such an expression of intention in clear and unequivocal terms. Section 21 is not in those terms.": pll7. Section 21 of the 1939 Ordinance provided: "Every licence, other than a special licence, shall (a) without regard to the date thereof, commence and take effect from the day on which it is actually issued by the Clerk; (b) if not previously forfeited, be in force until the expiration of a period of fourteen days immediately following the next succeeding annual sittings of the Court, but no longer." In my opinion. Sharp v Wakefield and Others [1891] AC 173 referred to by Gallop J is just the kind of case that has to be carefully scrutinised before a statement found in it is given a generality it was never intended to have. Their Lordships were concerned with the question whether licensing justices had a discretion to refuse to renew a licence on certain grounds. It was part of the ratio decidendi that a renewed licence partook of the character of an originally granted licence to the extent that matters that might be considered by the licensing justices upon an application for an original grant might also be considered upon a renewal


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.