Territory Stories

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Details:

Title

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Other title

Chandler Facility Statement of Intent; Chandler Facility Statement of Reasons; Chandler Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Chandler Facility Supplement to Draft EIS; NTEPA Assessment Report

Creator

Coffey Environments; Low Ecological Services; Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority; Northstar Air Quality; Quintessa Limited; K-UTEC AG Salt Technologies; Douglas Partners Pty Ltd; EMM Consulting Pty Limited; Beca Corporate Holdings Limited; R. Gregory and Associates; Ninti One; Acil Allen Consulting; Michels Warren Munday

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT

Date

2012-11-01

Location

Maryvale Station; Henbury Station

Description

Tellus Holdings Ltd proposes to develop and operate the Chandler Facility Project (salt mine and waste storage facilities) within the Maryvale and Henbury Station Pastoral Leases, approximately 120 km south of Alice Springs and 15 km from the Titjikala community in the Northern Territory.

Notes

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

Statement of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Notice of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Statement of Reasons -- Statement of Reasons -- Copies of submissions -- Draft Environment Impact Statement and Appendices -- Supplement report to the Draft EIS.

Language

English

Publisher name

Tellus Holdings Ltd.; Northern Territory Government

Place of publication

Alice Springs

Format

12 Volumes : colour illustrations, colour maps ; 30 cm.

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

Tellus Holdings Ltd.

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/292107

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400422

Related items

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400425; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400420; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400418; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400416; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400413; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400427; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400409; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400407; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400404; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400402; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400411

Page content

16.1004.FR1B.V1_a PART B: CHANDLER FACILITY Part B | Page 79 CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONAL PHASE RISK ASSESSMENT Table 32. Table 32 General Considerations for Containment Building Design Facility Element Design Considerations General considerations for building Building Must be constructed of man-made materials Must provide sufficient structural strength to prevent unit failure Must be completely enclosed (floor/walls/roof) Must have a decontamination area for personnel, equipment, and vehicles Doors/Windows Must be placed so as not to come into contact with waste Must have dust controls to minimise fugitive emissions Contact Surfaces Must be chemically compatible with waste Primary Barrier (floor) Must be constructed of man-made material (typically concrete) Must be structurally sound and chemically compatible with waste General considerations for liquid collection system Primary Barrier Must be sloped toward liquid collection device Liquid Collection System Must allow for removal of waste for proper management Leak Detection System Must detect release of waste at earliest practicable time Secondary Barrier Must be structurally sound and chemically resistant to the waste Must contain and allow for removal of accumulating wastes This is required only for "wet areas" within the Proposal site, but are recommended for both "wet" and "dry areas Note: Adapted from US EPA: Solid Waste and Emergency Response Introduction to Containment Building EPA530-K-05-008 Any containment building would be designed to accommodate the workforce and minimum ventilation rates would be required (through adherence to Building Council of Australia requirements, relevant Australian Standards (AS/NZS) etc). Given the potential size of the Facility, a number of independent ventilation systems may be considered, with appropriate points of emission to the ambient environment. Emissions of hazardous materials may be released through these points should leaks or spillage occur within the Proposal site. The system should therefore be designed to achieve maximum dilution and dispersion of any released emissions such that impacts on any surrounding sensitive receptors are minimised. The impacts associated with a waste spill or leak within a contained building and subsequent emission through a controlled stack would be anticipated to be significantly lower than the impacts associated with a spill/leak in the ambient environment (as assessed within this AQRA).


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.