Territory Stories

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Details:

Title

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Other title

Chandler Facility Statement of Intent; Chandler Facility Statement of Reasons; Chandler Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Chandler Facility Supplement to Draft EIS; NTEPA Assessment Report

Creator

Coffey Environments; Low Ecological Services; Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority; Northstar Air Quality; Quintessa Limited; K-UTEC AG Salt Technologies; Douglas Partners Pty Ltd; EMM Consulting Pty Limited; Beca Corporate Holdings Limited; R. Gregory and Associates; Ninti One; Acil Allen Consulting; Michels Warren Munday

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT

Date

2012-11-01

Location

Maryvale Station; Henbury Station

Description

Tellus Holdings Ltd proposes to develop and operate the Chandler Facility Project (salt mine and waste storage facilities) within the Maryvale and Henbury Station Pastoral Leases, approximately 120 km south of Alice Springs and 15 km from the Titjikala community in the Northern Territory.

Notes

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

Statement of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Notice of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Statement of Reasons -- Statement of Reasons -- Copies of submissions -- Draft Environment Impact Statement and Appendices -- Supplement report to the Draft EIS.

Language

English

Publisher name

Tellus Holdings Ltd.; Northern Territory Government

Place of publication

Alice Springs

Format

12 Volumes : colour illustrations, colour maps ; 30 cm.

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

Tellus Holdings Ltd.

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/292107

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400422

Related items

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400425; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400420; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400418; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400416; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400413; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400427; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400409; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400407; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400404; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400402; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400411

Page content

16.1004.FR1C.V1 PART C: APIRNTA FACILITY Part C | Page 12 CHAPTER 2: COMMON STUDY COMPONENTS 2.2. Legislation, Regulation and Guidance Part A Section 3 provides an overview of the legislative context, including the significant legislation and guidance, and the derivation of the air quality criteria used to assess the performance of the Proposal. 2.3. Existing Conditions Part A Section 4 addresses existing conditions (the baseline conditions) at the Proposal site, including an assessment of surrounding land sensitivity, existing air quality, topography and prevailing meteorology. 2.3.1. Surrounding Land Sensitivity Part A Table 11 presents the identified sensitive receptor locations used in the AQRA. It is noted that not all receptors are relevant to every component study element, but this common receptor list is used across all parts to assess Proposal performance. Part A Section 4.1.1 Presents a graphical representation of the surrounding receptor locations for the wider Proposal site. Figure 1 below presents a more localised graphic displaying those receptors more relevant to the AQRA of the proposed Apirnta Facility.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.