Territory Stories

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Details:

Title

Chandler Salt Mine Project

Other title

Chandler Facility Statement of Intent; Chandler Facility Statement of Reasons; Chandler Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Chandler Facility Supplement to Draft EIS; NTEPA Assessment Report

Creator

Coffey Environments; Low Ecological Services; Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority; Northstar Air Quality; Quintessa Limited; K-UTEC AG Salt Technologies; Douglas Partners Pty Ltd; EMM Consulting Pty Limited; Beca Corporate Holdings Limited; R. Gregory and Associates; Ninti One; Acil Allen Consulting; Michels Warren Munday

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT

Date

2012-11-01

Location

Maryvale Station; Henbury Station

Description

Tellus Holdings Ltd proposes to develop and operate the Chandler Facility Project (salt mine and waste storage facilities) within the Maryvale and Henbury Station Pastoral Leases, approximately 120 km south of Alice Springs and 15 km from the Titjikala community in the Northern Territory.

Notes

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

Statement of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Notice of Intent -- Clause 14A variation Statement of Reasons -- Statement of Reasons -- Copies of submissions -- Draft Environment Impact Statement and Appendices -- Supplement report to the Draft EIS.

Language

English

Publisher name

Tellus Holdings Ltd.; Northern Territory Government

Place of publication

Alice Springs

Format

12 Volumes : colour illustrations, colour maps ; 30 cm.

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

Tellus Holdings Ltd.

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/292107

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400422

Related items

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400425; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400420; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400418; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400416; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400413; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400427; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400409; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400407; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400404; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400402; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/400411

Page content

16.1004.FR1A.V1 PART A COMMON STUDY COMPONENTS Part A | Page 79 CHAPTER 5: METHODOLOGY Impact Magnitude Magnitude is a descriptor for the predicted scale of change to air quality conditions that may be attributed to the Proposal. In this report, the magnitude of air quality impacts is determined through a predictive dispersion modelling assessment. The impact predictions are compared against the relevant compound-specific toxicity criterion and odour criterion (see Part A, Section 3) to derive the corresponding magnitude of impacts for that contaminant using the methodology presented in Part A, Table 20. Table 20 Operational Phase Magnitude of Impacts Magnitude Description Examples Substantial Impact is predicted to cause significant consequences on the receiving environment A significant change which involves a variation in predicted concentration by > 10% of a long-term criterion or 50% of short-term criterion, or lead to an exceedance of the relevant criterion. Substantial risk that the impacts would generate nuisance complaints, resulting in regulatory action. Moderate Impact is predicted to possibly cause statutory objectives / standards to be exceeded A noticeable change which involves a variation in predicted concentration of 5% to 10% of long-term criterion or 25% to 50% of short-term criterion. Moderate risk that the impacts would generate nuisance complaints, resulting in regulatory action. Slight Predicted impact may be tolerated. A barely measurable change which involves a variation in predicted concentration of 2.5%-5% of long-term criterion or 10% to 25% of short-term criterion. Slight risk that the impacts would generate nuisance complaints, resulting in regulatory action. Negligible Impact is predicted to cause no significant consequences. A negligible change which involves a variation in predicted concentration of < 2.5% of the long-term criterion or < 10% of the short-term criterion. Negligible risk that the impacts would generate nuisance complaints, resulting in regulatory action. To provide quantitative assessment of impact magnitude, the AQRA is underpinned by a dispersion modelling study. The impacts associated with the operation of the Proposal at Chandler and the potential impacts from the loss of containment of containerised product salt, solid waste and sludge / liquid wastes at the Apirnta Facility, Chandler Facility and on the interconnecting transportation routes has been assessed through the use of dispersion modelling studies.