Territory Stories

Transcript of Interview Ms Martin/Mr Reed/Ms Vamourie with Ms Christensen 8DDD ABC Darwin Drive Time dated 27 November 2001

Details:

Title

Transcript of Interview Ms Martin/Mr Reed/Ms Vamourie with Ms Christensen 8DDD ABC Darwin Drive Time dated 27 November 2001

Other title

Tabled paper 255

Collection

Tabled Papers for 9th Assembly 2001 - 2005; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2002-03-05

Description

Tabled By Dennis Burke

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C1968A00063

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/285007

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/407407

Page content

2 VAMOURIE: Well, what is a tax at the end? It's a question of contributing to the coffers of the Government. Yes, it is a tax if it is in terms of saying a tax is a type that you tax segments of consumption, yes it's a tax. Because people who smoke get taxed, people in traditional conventional budgets in order to actually to deter them from smoking. In terms of the environment lobbyists I guess it is a question of saying it's a tax for people driving up and down their cars and maybe they wont drive their cars anymore. Reporter: So motorists, the big losers, does that make it a fairly broad based tax. VAMOURIE: I wouldn't call it losers as much as contributors to the black hole. I think that someone has got to pay. Some people have to pay more than others and I think we have got a fairly large motor traffic consumption public and I think they're contributing everyone evenly. What I was quite impressed with is it even hits the government taxes. Reporter: What about water and sewerage charges up by 5%? The Government really didnt have too many options did they? VAMOURIE: They didnt. They didnt have much options actually but the reality is that the budget is a lot more than just a directional change. It is much more to do with how the behavior of the Government as a partner, thats what's emerging here, very clearly both from the Summit as well as from the initiators that the Government has taken. Reporter: What do you mean in terms of this mini budget? VAMOURIE: In terms of the mini budget it means what we are really talking about is a shift in the emphasis from being politically driven budget to a management driven budget, to a budget that looks at it from the point of view of people trying to drive and deliver the services that they were promised. Reporter: In terms of the public service? VAMOURIE: In terms of the public service, in terms of the CEO's, in terms of the accountability of CEO's performances. Basically, it's a question of saying that I would admit that the budget is in terms of administrative machinery rather in terms of a political gimmickry. This transcript is taken from a tape recording, and freedom from errors, omissions or misunderstandings cannot be guaranteed.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.