Territory Stories

Debates Day 3 - Thursday 23 February 1995

Details:

Title

Debates Day 3 - Thursday 23 February 1995

Other title

Parliamentary Record 8

Collection

Debates for 7th Assembly 1994 - 1997; ParliamentNT; Parliamentary Record; 7th Assembly 1994 - 1997

Date

1995-02-23

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Language

English

Subject

Debates

Publisher name

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Place of publication

Darwin

File type

application/pdf

Use

Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/281602

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/414132

Page content

DEBATES - Thursday 23 February 1995 This is a subject in respect of which there are more complaints from business than in relation to any other area. It relates to the matter of contracts and how they operate, who got what etc. We felt that the legislation should require the Procurement Review Boards to table a report in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sittings days of 30 June each year. Mr STONE: Mr Chairman, I assure the Leader of the Opposition that the performance and functions of Procurement Review Boards will be included in the annual report of the Department of Industries and Development, thus making this amendment unnecessary. I will ensure that it is brought to the attention of officers that a separate portion of the report will be devoted to this. That will save the expense of 2 separate reports. Given that procurement is now back with the Ministry of Industries and Development, it appears that, as a matter of commonsense, that should be reported on in the context of that departments annual report. Mr EDE: Mr Chairman, the opposition accepts the assurances of the honourable minister. Amendment negatived. Clause 6 agreed to. Clauses 7 and 8 agreed to. Clause 9: Mr EDE: Mr Chairman, I move amendment 21.3. Mr Chairman, as I mentioned earlier, the bill provides an exemption power. There are reasons for this, but it is a very substantial power. Clause 5 states: The minister may, in writing, exempt an accountable officer from the need to comply with a provision of this a c t ... That would mean that the accountable officer does not have to comply with the provisions. Clause 9, certificate of exemption relating to inviting tenders, states: (1) Where the minister is satisfied that it is expedient to invite tenders in accordance with this act, the minister may dispense with all or specific requirements o f this act relating to tenders by the issue o f a certificate o f exemption. (2) Where a certificate o f exemption is issued under subsection (I), the requirements or the specified requirements o f this act, as the case may be, need not be complied with. We have a piece of legislation that sets out an excellent way of doing business. However, it also includes this exemption power that allows people not to comply with any of it. Circumstances happen. I recall the honourable Treasurer referring on one occasion to large reels of copper wire. I believe that was the example he used. A big project reached a certain point. These reels are worth around $60 000 or $70 000 each. 2709


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.