Territory Stories

Annual Report 2010-2011 National Environment Protection Council

Details:

Title

Annual Report 2010-2011 National Environment Protection Council

Other title

Tabled paper 1729

Collection

Tabled papers for 11th Assembly 2008 - 2012; Tabled papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2012-02-22

Description

Deemed paper

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/280788

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/415586

Page content

National Environmental Protection Council annual report 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1102 A C T A IR T O X IC S Australian Capital Territory Report to the NEPC on the implementation of the National Environment Protection (Air Toxics) Measure for the Australian Capital Territory by Mr Simon Corbell MLA, Minister for the Environment and Sustainable Development, for the reporting year ended 30 June 2011. PART 1 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEPM AND ANY SIGNIFICANT ISSUES The Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, has the responsibility for the administration of the National Environment Protection Measure for Air Toxics (the NEPM). PART 2 ASSESSMENT OF NEPM EFFECTIVENESS In accordance with clause 8 of the NEPM, the ACT has previously undertaken a desktop analysis for the identification of stage 1 and 2 sites. This assessment was undertaken in accordance with the nationally agreed Desktop Analysis procedure. Only one stage 1 site was identified, which was not subsequently identified as a stage 2 site requiring monitoring. Reporting on assessment and action if any planned or taken to manage air toxics The previous desktop analysis has shown that air toxics are not an issue for the ACT. Repeat identification of stage 1 and stage 2 sites The ACT has not repeated the desktop analysis exercise because a preliminary analysis of the ACTs emission profile has not identified any significant change since the first desktop analysis. Since this assessment was undertaken, there has been an improvement in the ACTs air quality because of actions on both wood heaters and motor vehicle emissions.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.