Annual Report 2010-2011 National Environment Protection Council
Tabled paper 1729
Tabled papers for 11th Assembly 2008 - 2012; Tabled papers; ParliamentNT
Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
National Environmental Protection Council annual report 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 156 Implementation issues arising For detailed implementation activities, please refer to jurisdictional reports as listed in Part 5. Table 2: Summary of implementation issues arising Jurisdiction Summary of implementation issues arising Commonwealth Nil issues reported. New South Wales Nil issues reported. Victoria Nil issues reported. Queensland Nil issues reported. Western Australia Nil issues reported. South Australia Nil issues reported. Tasmania Nil issues reported. Australian Capital Territory Nil issues reported. Northern Territory Nil issues reported. PART 3 JURISDICTIONAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES UNDER THE NEPM All jurisdictions report a high level of compliance with the guidelines as set out in the NEPM. Government agencies in each relevant jurisdiction continue to work closely with local government to deal with potential contamination issues. Most jurisdictions have assumed the NEPM guidelines into legislation or planning codes to ensure greater compliance. Clause 9 of the NEPM sets out the information that jurisdictions are required to report. Please refer to jurisdictional reports in Part 5. PART 4 ASSESSMENT OF NEPM EFFECTIVENESS The NEPM continues to provide guidance to professional practitioners in the field of site contamination assessment. One jurisdiction noted that some improvements in the consistency of site assessment have resulted from use of the NEPM. Jurisdictional suggestions for the enhancement of the NEPM included the development of national guidelines for assessing contaminated sites in pristine or highly protected areas; an expansion of the NEPM to enable the assessment of ecological health risk; and more guidance on assessing some of the volatile contaminants that are commonly encountered on many sites. Broadening the accessibility of assessment guidelines was also suggested as a way of improving the administration of the NEPM. NEPM variation Work continued on a process to vary the NEPM during 201011. It is expected that this work will be completed during the next reporting period. The variation process aims to improve guidance on a range of site assessment issues, including revised health-based investigation levels, a new national methodology for derivation of ecological investigation levels, dealing with petroleum hydrocarbon contamination, updated site characterisation technologies and assessing asbestos soil contamination. The process aims to improve assessment and response to potential human health risks and provide a scientific basis for the evaluation of ecological risks from common soil contaminants. It is anticipated that the variation of the NEPM will improve the standard and consistency of site assessments by clarifying certain aspects of the NEPM that have not been consistently applied by environmental practitioners. PART 5 REPORTING ON IMPLEMENTATION BY JURISDICTIONS The annexes to this report are in Appendix 1. A SS E SS M E N T O F SI T E C O N TA M IN A T IO N N E PM
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.
We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
You are welcome to provide further information or feedback about this item by emailing TerritoryStories@nt.gov.au