Territory Stories

Debates Day 3 - Thursday 21 October 1993



Debates Day 3 - Thursday 21 October 1993

Other title

Parliamentary Record 21


Debates for 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994; ParliamentNT; Parliamentary Record; 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994




Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory





Publisher name

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Place of publication


File type



Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory



Parent handle


Citation address


Page content

DF.RATES Thursday 21 October 1993 Mr- BELL: Mr* Deputy Speaker, the reason that 1 am not pursuing that at this s t a g e a n d in that form is because of the haste of the deliberations. In h i s j u d g m e n t on Hulley v Hill, Justice Mildren said that the Criminal C o d e e x p r e s s l y repealed the Criminal Law Consolidation Act and Ordinances. H o w e v e r , a t p a g e 12 of his judgment, he said that it repealed also the s t a t u t o r y p o w e r s of arrest that had existed up to that time. In the very b r i e f t i m e t h a t has been available to me - namely, since Monday - I have b ee n u n a b l e , a n d indeed the Parliamentary Counsel has been unable, to d i s c o v e r t h e st a t u t o r y powers of arrest that Justice Mildren referred to in that p a r t i c u l a r case. I have no doubt that, given the legal research that the A t t o r n e y - G e n e r a l has undertaken, he will be able to inform us in that r e g a r d b e c a u s e , by golly, he will receive a grilling during the committee stage o n t h a t point. Basically, I believe that he has been half-smart with this b i l l , a n d we will see how well he answers a few questions during the c o m m i t t e e s t a g e in that regard. Mr Manziei You did not clear this with your boss. He just went crook about ' r e a s o n a b l e grounds', so you had better show him this. Mr BELL: T h e point that I wish to make in conclusion concerns the m i n i s t e r ' s c l a i m s in his letter to the Leader of the Opposition where he re f e r r e d t o H u l l e y v Hill. This bill is a response to that decision. I would l i k e t o p o i n t out that the implication that has been made in this case is t h a t s h o p l i f t e r s have gone free because there has been no citizen's power of a r r e s t . T h e fact is that that was not the issue at all. The juveniles, who w e r e t h e s hoplifters in this case, were brought to book. The question i n v o l v e d i n H u l l e y v Hill was one of admissibility of evidence. Mr Manzie: T h a t is not the issue. Mr BELL: T h e Attorney-General has been saying that there is no power of ci t izen's a r r e s t . Mr Manzie: R e a d what Mildren said! Mr BELL: As I pointed out to him in my letter, shop detectives and security g u a r d s ar e getting on with their jobs. There is no reason to believe t h a t t h e parliament would be unable to deal with this in the normal course o f b u s i n e s s , effect the necessary amendments and pass a good, cons i d e r e d p i e c e o f legislation if we left it until November. However, the At t o r n e y G e n e r a l w ants a cheap shot and a law-and-order burst, and he intends t o p o r t r a y our attempt to find a better piece of legislation and make s o m e c o n s t r u c t i v e improvements as some kind of broad-brush opposition to a c o n s t r u c t i v e law-and-order approach. It will not wash with this House, and I d o n o t b e l i e v e it will wash with the community. For him to make the system o f l a w a n d order in the Territory and the administration of justice s ubservient t o h i s short-term political aims does him no credit whatsoever. Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! The honourable member's time has expired! Mr PARISH (Millner) : Mr Speaker, I do not intend to take anything like my en t i r e t i m e o n this because my colleagues have dealt quite fully with the legal i m p l i c a t i o n s o f this bill. I will return to them briefly. However, the c o n c e r n t h a t I have is more a practical one with the way that the government w i l l s e e k to promote, portray or publicise the legislation once it has g o n e t h r o u g h . I am concerned that, unless there is a responsible publication o f t h e right that will exist again so to speak, there is a risk that p e o p l e w i l l take the law into their own hands and be hurt in the process. I h o p e that the Attorney-General will take cognisance of that and 10 218

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.