Territory Stories

Debates Day 2 - Wednesday 1 May 1991

Details:

Title

Debates Day 2 - Wednesday 1 May 1991

Other title

Parliamentary Record 3

Collection

Debates for 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994; ParliamentNT; Parliamentary Record; 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994

Date

1991-05-01

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Language

English

Subject

Debates

Publisher name

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Place of publication

Darwin

File type

application/pdf

Use

Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/279515

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/418775

Page content

DEBATES - Wednesday 1 May 1991 Hr SMITH: It proves that the task force was independent and that the Department of Education was not. The Minister for Education has handled this process very badly Indeed. School closures require sensitive and careful handling. They require a commitment from the government that it will go through the processes and that it will consult properly. As I said to the Rapid Creek school community, the major problem was that it had not been properly consulted and still has not. Obviously, it will never be consulted properly. It is always a difficult exercise and it has not been made any easier by the minister proceeding in his jack-booted way, as he has throughout the whole process, upsetting school communities and upsetting children. It might surprise the minister to know that many parents at Rapid Creek have had to comfort kids who have come home crying that the government is closing their school. This has had a major impact on the lives of up to 1000 kids and their parents right across the Northern Territory. There has been no recognition of that whatsoever. He has forgotten the human element in all of this. The reason simply is that he has been forced into this exercise by the fact that the government has had to save money. We can forget everything else. We can forget all the educational arguments that are advanced from time to time. It has been a simple panic-driven, money-saving exercise brought about by 5 or 6 years of government inactivity, staring into the face of disaster and failing to do anything about it. Once again, it is the people at the bottom, the ordinary parents who send their kids to an ordinary government school, who have suffered. This motion seeks to censure the Minister for Education for the clumsy manner in which he has gone about that exercise and the hurt and the distress that he has caused to people. Let me give another example of how clumsy this exercise has been. Mr Speaker, if you were a teacher at Tiwi or Rapid Creek Primary School or at one of those other schools when the decision was taken, you would feel some responsibility for the closure. In particular, the teachers at Rapid Creek Primary School felt very badly They felt that they had failed the school. However, no one came to see them for at least a week after the decision was taken. Hr Stone: That is not true. Hr SHITH: It 1s true. Mr Stone: The superintendents were there next day. Mr SHITH: Mr Speaker, I happened to be at Rapid Creek Primary School on Friday. I saw the Deputy Secretary chauffeuring somebody - I believe it was his secretary - who dropped off a letter relating to school closures to the principal of the school. A man on $75 000 to $80 000, the Deputy Secretary to the Department of Education, was chauffeuring somebody to drop off a letter. He did not go inside himself. Hr Stone: You make it up as you go along. Hr SHITH: Do you want to see me outside? Hembers interjecting. Hr Coulter: Are you offering physical violence to the honourable mini ster? 812


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.