Territory Stories

Debates Day 2 - Wednesday 1 May 1991

Details:

Title

Debates Day 2 - Wednesday 1 May 1991

Other title

Parliamentary Record 3

Collection

Debates for 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994; ParliamentNT; Parliamentary Record; 6th Assembly 1990 - 1994

Date

1991-05-01

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Language

English

Subject

Debates

Publisher name

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

Place of publication

Darwin

File type

application/pdf

Use

Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory

License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/279515

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/418775

Page content

DEBATES - Wednesday 1 May 1991 the place may be carried out and this must only be in accordance with any conditions specified in writing. For heritage places of the highest value and where long-term preservation is seen to be the prime objective, a conservation management plan is provided for. The council may prepare a conservation management plan taking into account the opinion of the owner and/or occupier of the place. A draft plan shall also be made available to the general public for review and comment, with a minimum of 28 days being allowed for this consultation process. The council will then forward the plan, together with any representations to the minister, for presentation to the Administrator. If the Administrator makes any alteration to the plan, he shall prepare a report specifying the alteration and the report shall accompany the plan when both are tabled in the Legislative Assembly. If the Assembly does not disallow the plan within 7 sitting days, the conservation management plan comes into operation. Part 6 of the bill makes special provision for archeological places and objects. Although the most significant of such places and objects will be assessed and registered as part of Territory heritage, as I have already made reference to, it is also necessary that certain classes of places should be given protection from wanton damage and destruction, whether they have been nominated for assessment or not. For example, rock art galleries and burial sites should be generally protected from vandalism or deliberate damage. The existing Native and Historical Objects and Areas Preservation Act already provides some protection for certain objects and areas of archeological value. However, that legislation was enacted over 35 years ago and is now inadequate. This bill, together with the regulations which will prescribe the archeological places and objects covered by the proposed act, will give enhanced protection to these. Hence the Native and Historical Objects and Areas Preservation Act will be repealed with suitable transitional arrangements in place. I table a draft of the proposed regulations for the information of members of this Assembly. Obviously, further regulations will be developed to cover matters such as heritage assessment criteria and work permitted on heritage places etc. It is intended that the development of further regulations, as provided for in the legislation, will be given high priority by the proposed Heritage Advisory Council. Further to this, a landowner may enter into a heritage agreement with the Territory relating to the protection and conservation of a heritage place and heritage objects. This agreement is binding on the landowner who enters into it and also to successors in title, but may be varied by further agreement. The bill provides for a variety of financial and other incentives. These are not specified in detail, but might include special grants, loans or other funding assistance for the maintenance of the heritage place or object. It provides also that, where a minister or statutory corporation is exercising a power under a law in force in the Territory which could assist in the conservation of a place subject to a heritage agreement, that power should be exercised in accordance with any recommendation of the minister for heritage. The whole emphasis in this legislation is directed toward cooperation and agreement with property owners rather than through regulation and acquisition. In the final resort, however, acquisition may be necessary in order to ensure the protection of some heritage places and objects. There are also substantial penalty provisions for those who might seek to ignore the protective provisions of the legislation. The penalty provision, particularly for corporations, has been set deliberately at a substantial 864


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.