Territory Stories

OmbudsmanNT Report to The Honourable John Elferink MLA Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Compliance by Northern Territory Police Force with Surveillance Devices Act Second Report 2015

Details:

Title

OmbudsmanNT Report to The Honourable John Elferink MLA Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Compliance by Northern Territory Police Force with Surveillance Devices Act Second Report 2015

Other title

Tabled paper 1485

Collection

Tabled Papers for 12th Assembly 2012 - 2016; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2015-09-17

Description

Deemed

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

Publisher name

Ombudsman NT

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C01384

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/274119

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/425675

Page content

8 5.2 - Section 55(1 )(b) The Chief Officer ensures that a record or report mentioned in subsection 55(1 )(a) is destroyed if satisfied it is not likely to be required in relation to a purpose mentioned in section 52(3), 53(1) or 54(1). Inspection 16 June 2015: No records have been destroyed since the last inspection of 2 December 2014. 6. REPORTING AND RECORD-KEEPING 6.1 - Section 58(1) Law enforcement officer makes a report under this section to the Judge or Magistrate who issued the warrant, within the time stated in the warrant. Inspection 16 June 2015: Of the 24 warrants the subject of report for this inspection period, records indicated: 18 warrants - a report to the Judge or Magistrate had been provided. 5 warrants - current and therefore do not fall within the ambit of this section. 1 warrant - expired however the report to the Judge or Magistrate is not yet due. 6.2 - Section 58(2)(a) The report to the Judge or Magistrate must state whether the warrant was executed. Inspection 16 June 2015: All reports to the issuing Judge or Magistrate indicated whether or not the warrants relating to such reports had been executed. 6.3 - Section 58(2)(b)(i) If the warrant was executed the kind of surveillance device used must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: All reports to a Judge or Magistrate inspected stated the kind of device used. 6.4 - Section 58(2)(b)(ii) If the warrant was executed the period during which the device was used must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: Of all reports to a Judge or Magistrate inspected each stated the period during which the warrant was used.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.