Territory Stories

OmbudsmanNT Report to The Honourable John Elferink MLA Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Compliance by Northern Territory Police Force with Surveillance Devices Act Second Report 2015

Details:

Title

OmbudsmanNT Report to The Honourable John Elferink MLA Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Compliance by Northern Territory Police Force with Surveillance Devices Act Second Report 2015

Other title

Tabled paper 1485

Collection

Tabled Papers for 12th Assembly 2012 - 2016; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2015-09-17

Description

Deemed

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

Publisher name

Ombudsman NT

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C01384

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/274119

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/425675

Page content

9 6.5 - Section 58(2)(b)(iii) If the warrant was executed the name, if known, of any person whose conversations or activities were overheard, listened to, monitored, recorded or observed by the use of the device must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: Reports inspected documented the name of the person/s whose activities were monitored in compliance with this section. 6.6 - Section 58(2)(b)(iv) If the warrant was executed the name, if known, of any person whose geographical location was determined by the use of the device must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: Of the reports inspected, each documented the name of the person/s whose geographical location was determined in compliance with this section. 6.7 - Section 58(2)(b)(v) If the warrant was executed the details of any place on which the device was installed or used must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: All reports inspected stated the details of the place on (or in) which the device was installed or used. 6.8 - Section 58(2)(b)(vi) anything on which the device was installed or any place where the thing was located when it was installed must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. If the warrant was executed the details of Inspection 16 June 2015: Of all reports inspected, each stated the details of the thing on which the device was installed or the place where the thing was located when it was installed. 6.9 - Section 58(2)(b)(vii) If the warrant was executed the details of the benefit to the investigation of the use of the device and of the general use made of any evidence or information obtained by the use of the device must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: All reports inspected stated the benefit of the investigation and if relevant the general use made of any evidence or information obtained by the use of the device. 6.10 - Section 58(2)(b)(viii) If the warrant was executed the details of the compliance with the conditions to which the warrant was subject must be stated in the report to the Judge or Magistrate. Inspection 16 June 2015: An examination of the records identified that details of compliance with conditions of warrants issued conditionally were identified within the report to the Judge or Magistrate.