Territory Stories

Development of a Groundwater Flow Model - Berry Springs

Details:

Title

Development of a Groundwater Flow Model - Berry Springs

Creator

Knapton, Anthony

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; 17/2016

Date

2016

Location

Berry Springs

Description

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

Table of Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Glossary of Terms -- Executive Summary -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Background -- 1.1 Aim of the study -- 2 Site Description -- 2.1 Study area location -- 2.2 Climate -- 2.2.1 Rainfall data -- 2.2.2 Evaporation data -- 2.3 Hydrology -- 2.4 Land use -- 2.5 Groundwater extraction -- 2.6 Water quality -- 3 Hydrogeology -- 3.1 Geological formations -- 3.1.1 Mount Bonnie Formation (Pso) -- 3.1.2 Unnamed Dolostone Unit (Psd): Berry Springs Dolostone -- 3.1.3 Burrell Creek Formation (Pfb) -- 3.1.4 Depot Creek Formation (Ptd) -- 3.1.5 Petrel Formation (JKp) -- 3.1.6 Darwin Member (Kld) -- 3.2 Geological structure -- 3.3 Aquifer characteristics -- 3.3.1 Hydraulic conductivity -- 3.3.2 Storage coefficient -- 4 Groundwater hydrology -- 4.1 Groundwater flow -- 4.2 Recharge -- 4.2.1 Water balance method -- 4.2.2 Water table fluctuation method -- 4.2.3 Spring discharge -- 4.2.4 Evapotranspiration -- 4.3 Rainfall-runoff modelling -- 4.4 Predicted natural conditions compared to recent observed flows -- 4.5 Groundwater chemistry -- 5 Available data -- 5.1 Climate data -- 5.2 SRTM digital terrain model -- 5.3 Geological data -- 5.4 Groundwater level data -- 5.4.1 Steady state groundwater levels -- Berry Springs Groundwater Flow Model -- 5.4.2 Time series groundwater levels -- 5.5 River discharge data -- 5.5.1 Manual gauging data -- 5.5.2 Continuous recorder data -- 5.6 Pumping data -- 5.7 Data gaps -- 6 Groundwater flow model development -- 6.1 What is a groundwater flow model? -- 6.2 Conceptual model -- 6.3 Modelling approach -- 6.4 Model package -- 6.5 Model mesh geometry -- 6.5.1 Mesh design -- 6.5.2 Mesh generation -- 6.6 Material properties -- 6.7 Fracture flow -- 6.8 Boundary conditions -- 6.8.1 Recharge and Areal ET Flux -- 6.8.2 Constant head BC values -- 6.9 Pumping data -- 6.10 FEFLOW settings -- 6.10.1 Problem class -- 6.10.2 Temporal and control data -- 7 Calibration -- 7.1 Steady state finite element model -- 7.1.1 Steady state model results -- 7.2 Transient finite element model -- 8 Scenarios -- 8.1 Water balance assessment -- 8.2 Scenario A – Historic climate without pumping -- 8.2.1 Water balance under historic climate -- 8.3 Scenario B – Historic climate with current pumping estimates -- 8.3.1 Pumping estimate methodology -- 8.3.2 Water balance under historic climate and current pumping -- 8.3.3 Impacts of pumping on groundwater discharge at Berry Springs -- 8.3.4 Flow duration -- 9 Results and discussion -- 9.1 Measurable impacts -- 9.1.1 Reduced dry season flows -- 9.1.2 Recession slope of dry season flows -- 9.1.3 Groundwater levels -- 9.2 Rainfall, recharge & minimum flows analysis -- 9.3 Impacts of pumping based on zones -- 10 Conclusions -- 10.1 Key performance indicators -- 11 References -- Appendix A - Groundwater level hydrographs -- Appendix B - Calibrated transient model results

Language

English

Subject

Berry Springs Dolostone; Berry Springs aquifer System; Groundwater Flow Model

Publisher name

Department of Land Resource Management

Place of publication

Darwin

Series

17/2016

Format

72 pages : colour illustration and maps ; 30 cm.

File type

application/pdf.

ISBN

9781743501092

Copyright owner

Check within Publication or with content Publisher.

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/272355

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/428025

Page content

Berry Springs Groundwater Flow Model Page 47 of 72 a) b) Figure 24 Comparison of simulated discharge (m 3 /d) at Berry Springs spring complex under historic climatic conditions with no pumping and estimated current pumping for the period a) 1900-1950 and b) 1950-2010. The difference between the historic flow regime and the pumping scenario was calculated to further describe the impacts from pumping. Figure 25 demonstrates that the impact to late dry season discharge is always affected by more than 20%. Figure 25 Impact of pumping expressed as the percentage decrease from the modelled historic flows. 8.3.4 Flow duration To better demonstrate the effects of pumping on the flow regime of the spring complex a flow duration or flow exceedance curve has been developed for the two scenarios. The flow duration curve shows the percentage of time that flow in a stream is likely to equal or exceed some specified value of interest. The flow duration plots for the Berry Springs spring complex with no pumping and with pumping are presented in Figure 26. The plot shows that under historic climatic conditions with no-pumping the flow at the spring is above 0.2 m 3 /s for 80-90% of the time, whilst under historic climatic conditions and current pumping estimates the flow is reduced to about half of this 0.1 m 3 /s for 90% of the time.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.