Territory Stories

Coroners Act Response to the Coronial Findings in the matter of Ms Irene Magriplis dated 21 September 2017

Details:

Title

Coroners Act Response to the Coronial Findings in the matter of Ms Irene Magriplis dated 21 September 2017

Other title

Tabled paper 426

Collection

Tabled papers for 13th Assembly 2016 - 2020; Tabled papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2017-10-11

Description

Deemed

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/272337

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/428565

Page content

42. The HDU was an area on the ward with three beds that were monitored by one nurse. The nurse was a Registered Nurse but had no special training in intensive care procedures and no training for working in the HDU. 43. The family stayed in the HDU area while their mother was settled. She continued to complain of feeling nauseous, having extreme abdominal pain, being thirsty and burning inside. She was given Maxolon for the nausea and vomited. 44. The family noted the abdominal drain. There was light coloured, blood like fluid at the top of the drain and a thick discharge beneath. They spoke to the nurse about it. The nurse then spoke to a supervisor. However they were not given a,n explanation as to whether that was significant or not. 45. The family were told they couldn't stay overnight. Throughout the night Mrs Magriplis was kept on oxygen therapy of two .to three litres per minute. Her respiratory rate was fairly constant until midnight. After that it became more erratic, dropping to 15 breaths a minute at 2.00am and then rising to 27 breaths per minute at 4. OOam. 46. The observations were recorded on an "Adult General Observation Chart'" (Chart). The Chart was of the "track and trigger" variety. It had a white area indicating normal observations bounded first by a yellow zone and then a red zone after that. 47. The instructions to the Chart stated that the yellow zone indicated the need for a clinical review. The following was in capitals, "IF A PATIENT HAS ONE (1) OR MORE CLINICAL REVIEW CRITERIA PRESENT, YOU MUST CONSULT PROMPTLY WITH THE NURSE IN CHARGE AND ASSESS WHETHER A CLINICAL REVIEW IS NEEDED ... " 48. One of the actions then required was the recording of repeat observations within 30 minutes.


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.