Territory Stories

Coroners Act Response to the Coronial Findings in the matter of Ms Irene Magriplis dated 21 September 2017

Details:

Title

Coroners Act Response to the Coronial Findings in the matter of Ms Irene Magriplis dated 21 September 2017

Other title

Tabled paper 426

Collection

Tabled papers for 13th Assembly 2016 - 2020; Tabled papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2017-10-11

Description

Deemed

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/272337

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/428565

Page content

1 . Prepared due to the death of Irene Magriplis; and 2. Submitted to I-Iealthscope head office in relation to her death." 187. There was no response to that request. The General Manager was asked about that when giving evidence. She provided a 'Risktnan' report and confirmed that was the only document fitting the request. There was no Root Cause Analysis. There was no Critical Systems Review. 188. I asked her why that was so when the policy clearly defined the deterioration and death of Mrs Magriplis as a sentinel event. She initially said it was because, "Mrs Magriplis did not die in the Darwin Private Hospital". 35 When I pointed out that the place of death was not part of the definition, I was told it was because Healthscope did not classify the death of Mrs Magriplis as a sentinel event. Dr Seiler provided the following evidence: "The risk man that we submitted is reviewed by Healthscope and it was not defined as a sentinel event"~ Q. I'm sorry, who does the defining? A. The National Risk Quality Manager. Q. And why does the National Risk Quality Manager do the defining? A. It's their job."36 189. It was disappointing that Healthscope was willing to allege that they conduct reviews into all sentinel events in the very case they did not. 190. As I have often said, the Coroner's Court is not a court of perfection. Most people at some time fall into error. But having recognised the error it is important that it not be repeated. To ensure that, there must be a review performed seeking to understand why the systems permitted the errors and where improvements can be made. 35 Transcript pp 1 7 8, 1 7 9 36 Transcript p.l 79


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.