The value of investment in the early years
Balancing costs of childhood services
Menzies School of Health Research
Northern Territory. Department of Education and Training
E-Publications; PublicationNT; E-Books; Early Childhood Series
This publication was produced on behalf of the Department of Education and Training by the Menzies School of Health Research.; Robinson G, Silburn, SR, Arney F, 2011. The value of investment in the early years: Balancing costs of childhood services. Topical paper commissioned for the public consultations on the Northern Territory Early Childhood Plan. Darwin: Northern Territory Government.; Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).
Child development; Early childhood educaton; Northern Territory
Northern Territory Government
Early Childhood Series
No. 4 2011
Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
Northern Territory Government
THE VALUE OF INVESTMENT IN THE EARLY YEARS: BALANCING COSTS OF CHILDHOOD SERVICES v Executive summary A large proportion of the NTs children do not realise their developmental potential. This has significant implications for society and government as the consequences of poor early childhood development extend through the lifecycle. Children with compromised early development are at substantially increased risk for adverse educational outcomes, poor functional literacy, delinquency and crime, unemployment, substance misuse, poor adult physical and mental health, and premature death. There is much to be gained through better investment in the early years to reduce the population levels of poor health and social and emotional problems later in life. This will not only reduce the impact of these problems for individuals and society, but also add to the productive capabilities, skills and competencies of the next generation of Territorians. The costs to individuals of poor early development include reduced educational attainment, detrimental effects of welfare dependency, reduced quality of life and limited opportunities for effective participation in their own communities and wider society. Families and society also incur high costs in dealing with the burden of social and emotional problems and ill-health, as well as the costs associated with much higher rates of welfare dependency, involvement with the justice system and incarceration. At the same time, research regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of evidence-based early childhood interventions show that high quality programs can yield significant short and long-term benefits that far exceed their costs. These programs include approaches to enriched early learning in childcare centres and preschool settings (High/Scope Perry Preschool, Abecedarian etc.); parenting interventions from early infancy onwards delivered at home or in health or community centres (Nurse-Family Partnerships etc.); and a range of behavioural programs for parents and/or children that target child behaviour, mental health and social emotional learning (The Incredible Years program, Triple P Positive Parenting Program etc.). Research also suggests that careful targeting of early childhood development programs can optimise returns on investment and guard against the dilution of resources and effort. Low cost, poor quality versions of programs with weak implementation controls are unlikely to yield any return at all. Extrapolating from the evidence from high quality studies, it is argued that investment in equivalent early childhood programs made universally available for disadvantaged children can yield a significantly positive return on investment within two decades. Public investment in large-scale (population-wide) programs such as Head Start and Early Head Start in the USA and Sure Start in the UK has yielded somewhat variable benefits. There are also concerns about the extent of the overall return on the very substantial investment in these approaches. A major factor underlying the concerns about Sure Start was the fact that policy decisions about how the program was to be implemented in communities did not require the implementation of proven (i.e. evidence-based) programs and precluded their evaluation methodologies using controlled trials. These policy constraints have resulted in the reportable outcomes being more variable and less demonstrable than would otherwise have been the case. The implementation and evaluation of recent nationally funded, area-based initiatives in Australia have also been limited by such policy constraints. This seriously limited the potential benefit of this substantial investment and the learnings which could have emerged from more systematic program delivery and evaluation. High quality programs that have been rigorously evaluated for their preventive effects and their long-term benefits to individuals and society provide the strongest evidence regarding the characteristics of effective early childhood interventions.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.
We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
You are welcome to provide further information or feedback about this item by emailing TerritoryStories@nt.gov.au