Territory Stories

Assessment of the Jabiluka Project : report of the Supervising Scientist to the World Heritage Committee

Details:

Title

Assessment of the Jabiluka Project : report of the Supervising Scientist to the World Heritage Committee

Creator

Johnston, A.; Prendergast, J. B.; Bridgewater, Peter

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Supervising Scientist Report; 138

Date

1999

Location

Alligator Rivers Region

Table of contents

Main report--Appendix 2 of the Main Report. Submission to the Mission of the World Heritage Committee by some Australian Scientists ... --Attachment A. Johnston A. and Needham S. 1999. Protection of the environment near the Ranger uranium mine--Attachment B. Bureau of Meteorology 1999. Hydrometeorological analysis relevant to Jabiluka--Attachment C. Jones, R.N., Hennessy, K.J. and Abbs, D.J. 1999. Climate change analysis relevant to Jabiluka--Attachment D. Chiew, F and Wang, Q.J. 1999. Hydrological anaysis relevant to surface water storage at Jabiluka--Attachment E. Kalf, F. and Dudgeon, C. 1999. Analysis of long term groundwater dispersal of contaminants from proposed Jabiluka mine tailings repositories--Appendix 2 of Attachment E. Simulation of leaching on non-reactive and radionuclide contaminants from proposed Jabiluka silo banks.

Language

English

Subject

Uranium mill tailings - Environmental aspects - Northern Territory - Alligator Rivers Region; Environmental impact analysis - Northern Territory - Jabiluka; Uranium mines and mining - Environmental aspects - Northern Territory - Jabiluka; Jabiluka - Environmental aspects

Publisher name

Environment Australia

Place of publication

Canberra (A.C.T.)

Series

Supervising Scientist Report; 138

Format

1 volume (various pagings) : illustrations, maps

File type

application/pdf

ISBN

642243417

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

Environment Australia

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00042

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/264982

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462402

Related items

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462403; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462400; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462405; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462406; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462408; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462409; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/462411

Page content

23 (1999) also examined the correlations between the two stations for monthly rainfall, annual rainfall and daily rainfall characteristics. For example, the correlation for monthly rainfall is shown in figure 3.2.1. The correlation coefficients found for the Wet season months were 0.79 for DecemberFebruary and 0.92 for MarchMay. Overall the correlation is very good and the conclusion drawn by Chiew and Wang (1999) is that the Oenpelli data set should, because of the much longer record, be used for estimating the 1:10,000 AEP annual rainfall and for other hydrological modelling for the Jabiluka project. This conclusion is supported by the Bureau of Meteorology (1999). The long-term (19171998) statistics for annual rainfall at Oenpelli are given in table 3.2.2 (Bureau of Meteorology 1999). The long-term mean annual rainfall, 1397 30 mm, is significantly lower than the value of 1500 mm given in table 3.2.1 for the shorter record between 1971 and 1998. Carter (1990) used a cusum technique to examine long-term cycles or trends in the mean annual rainfall at a number of meteorological stations in the Northern Territory. The cusum method (Cumulative Sum) computes the sum, at any time in a time series, of the difference between the current observed value of a variable and the long-term mean value. This analysis revealed that the period between the mid-1960s until the mid1980s was one of significantly higher average rainfall than the long-term mean. This conclusion was valid for the stations at Darwin, Oenpelli, Pine Creek and Katherine. Hence the short-term record for Oenpelli, which is dominated by this period of higher than average rainfall, has a mean annual rainfall greater than the long-term mean. This conclusion is also likely to be true for Jabiru. Incorporation of this decadal-scale variation in rainfall into the design of the Jabiluka water management system is considered in chapter 4. Table 3.2.2 The annual characteristics of Oenpelli rainfall data Statistic Magnitude Standard Error Mean (mm) 1397 30.3 Standard deviation (mm) 284.5 21.4 Coefficient of skewness -0.018 0.257 3.2.2 Estimation of the 1:10,000 AEP annual rainfall for Jabiluka The Bureau of Meteorology (1999) notes that the coefficient of skewness of the annual rainfall series is small and that, therefore, the normal distribution is appropriate to describe the data. The annual rainfall data for Oenpelli and the fit to the data using a normal distribution are shown in figure 3.2.2. The x-axis in this graph has a normal probability scale and plotting position is determined by the rank of annual rainfall (plotted on the y-axis). Data that are normally distributed plot as a straight line on this type of graph. Chi-squared (2) test results (test statistic 4.39/chi-square value (0.05%) 9.49) and Kolmogorov Smirnov test results (test statistic 0.05881/value 0.145) indicate that the annual rainfall data series for Oenpelli is normally distributed. This conclusion is consistent with that of the Supervising Scientist (Vardavas 1992) who examined the distributions of annual rainfall data for several meteorological stations in the north of the Northern Territory. Vardavas (1992) concluded on the basis of a 2 analysis that the data for Darwin and Oenpelli were better described by a normal distribution than by a log-normal distribution. For these reasons, a normal distribution has been assumed in the estimation of the 1:10,000 AEP rainfall for Oenpelli. For a normal distribution, the probability of exceeding a particular value of the variable x is given by


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.