Territory Stories

The Northern Territory Disease Control Bulletin

Details:

Title

The Northern Territory Disease Control Bulletin

Creator

Territory Health Services, Centre for Disease Control

Collection

Northern Territory disease control bulletin; E-Journals; PublicationNT; Northern Territory disease control bulletin

Date

2002-03

Location

Casuarina

Notes

Date:2002-03; This publication contains may contain links to external sites. These external sites may no longer be active.; Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Language

English

Subject

Communicable diseases; Reporting; Northern Territory; Statistics; Periodicals

Publisher name

Northern Territory Government

Place of publication

Casuarina

Series

Northern Territory disease control bulletin

Volume

v. 9 no. 1

File type

application/pdf

ISSN

1440-883X

Use

Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Northern Territory Government

License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/233806

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/655675

Page content

The Northern Territory Disease Control Bulletin Vol 9, No.1, March 2002 9 non-Aboriginal Australian born students to those living in Aboriginal communities has had an effect with the proportion of Mantoux positive students increasing from 3.9% prior to 1997 to 5.0% thereafter. The numbers screened per year fell from an average of 2,060 per year (1991-96) to 608 per year (1997-2000). However the review has shown that focussing on the more at risk group for screening after 1996 has not necessarily resulted in improved coverage as envisioned. The Mantoux positivity of the overseas born students likely reflects the infection rate in the countries in which they were born rather than that of the community in which they now live and remained higher than that of the Aboriginal students throughout the 10 years of screening. Furthermore, screening programs in southern states have revealed Mantoux positivity rates in overseas born children much higher than those recorded in the NT (up to 27%2). The reason for this is unclear but may reflect to different mix of immigrants in other cities. A study from Melbourne showed 0% prevalence in those from southern Europe to a prevalence of 15.9% for those from Indo China.3 Patterns of the Mantoux response across the target groups reflect the underlying exposure to mycobacterial antigens of that population. Populations with a greater degree of exposure to M. tuberculosis will have a greater proportion of Mantoux responses in the 10-15 mm range and this will be seen as a second rise in the curve describing the distribution of Mantoux size. Hence, it can be seen that Australian born nonAboriginal students have a pattern which reflects minimal exposure to M. tuberculosis, while overseas born and Aboriginal students have an obvious biphasic pattern reflecting a greater degree of exposure. This reinforces the maxim that tuberculin testing needs to be interpreted with the underlying risk of TB exposure in mind. Outcome measures for 2000 revealed that a disappointing number of students (17.6% of those reviewed and eligible) completed the six month course of isoniazid. Given that treatment of LTBI is the major clinical benefit of the program, unless the number of completed courses can be increased, continuing the program would be difficult to justify. From a monetary viewpoint, cost benefit analysis has revealed that Mantoux school screening programs become cost saving in student populations when the Mantoux positivity rate reaches 20%4, which is significantly more than the rates observed in this program. While costbenefit status ought not to be the sole determinant of a programs existence, it does give a benchmark of efficiency and allows comparisons to be made with other health interventions. The NT TB guidelines are currently under revision and while this is happening school screening will continue for 2002. It will be important to demonstrate an ability to adequately screen the at-risk group of students as per the 1997 policy change and to achieve positive clinical outcomes in the future or the place of school screening as a useful disease prevention strategy (ie for identifying and treating LTBI) is in doubt. References 1. Wright J. and Krause V. Outcomes of NT School Mantoux Program 1991-1994. Abstract:PHA 2nd National Tuberculosis Conference, Sydney, 17-18 November 1997. 2. Alperstein J, Fett MJ, Reznik R, Thomas M, Senthil M. The prevalence of tuberculosis infection among Year 8 schoolchildren in inner Sydney in 1992. Med J Aust 1994;160:197-201. 3. Johnson PD, Carlin JB, Bennett CM, et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis infection in Melbourne secondary school students. Med J Aust 1998;168 (3):100-101. 4. Mohle-Boetani JC, Miller B, Halpern M, Trivedi A, Lessler J, Solomon S, Fenstersheib M. Schoolbased screening for tuberculosis infection. A costbenefit analysis. JAMA 1995;274:613-619. *************


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.