Territory Stories

Flood Warning and Damages in Alice Springs: Part 1 Executive Summary. Part 2 Tangible Damages Part 3 Intangible Damages & Emergency Procedures

Details:

Title

Flood Warning and Damages in Alice Springs: Part 1 Executive Summary. Part 2 Tangible Damages Part 3 Intangible Damages & Emergency Procedures

Creator

Handmer, John; Smith, D. I.; Greenaway, Mark

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Report ; 53/1989

Date

1989-04-01

Description

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Notes

Date:1989-04

Language

English

Publisher name

Power and Water Authority

Place of publication

Alice Springs

Series

Report ; 53/1989

File type

application/pdf.

Copyright owner

Check within Publication or with content Publisher.

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/228902

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/673596

Page content

Technical Report WRA89053 Viewed at 03:02:00 on 18/02/2010 Page 71 of 139. Views on the brochure: interviewees residential and commercial ~iews abouc t~e broch~re a~e in ~wo ge~e~al =a:egcr~es: those wno see i~ positively and those w~ase =omme~ts are ~ot posltive. lLrcost all (90%) of those who saij that t"ey had :o'"'":-t the broc.'1ure claimed to have ::ead is. ::owever, it ~s 6992.renC fro~ both types of comments tha: wt~le people may "ave looked at the brochure they had :-tot read or u:-tderstood rouen of 1::. Positi.ve comments concentrateci 0:1 ~ene:-al aspects of the broch~re. Two ~hirds of those resoc~dinc :0 t~e question (37 responde~ts) tho~ght that-L~e b~ochure was 1'1Jseful", although many of these people ~ad ~egative comments as l .... ell. People making t.hese comr:le::.ts effip:J.asised t~at the broch~re was a good idea because it reminded them 0f ~he flood problem, and because it looked good. Some dld say that they found t"e b::ochu::e clear and :-tet too long. Negative comment tended to focus C~ par~icular details o~ the brochure, although a few ~esponde~cs s2ld that it was "useless" or chat it would be ~=eated li~e j~~k mail and ignored. Unfo~~u~atelYI the fact that ~early half our interviewees did :-tot recall seeing the b~och~~e, suggests that ~any people did treat it as junk mail. Many mentioned points chat tjey felt should be covered, wh:=n are already in the b:::-oc:1.ure, indicating that parts of che brochure are not clear enc~gh (or that people are not readlng it closely). :nterviewees also suggesced ~~provements. One respondent. cor.Dented on the appa:::-en-c. coc:plet.e absence of warnings as described in the brochure. ~requently ~ade ':OC1.C1e"ts concerned the need to show "drainage" flooding problems (b6th because of the need to show flood-free access, espec~ally to the evacuation centres, and because t"e flood map may create a false sense o~ security by not s:'1owi:-tg chem) . The i~terviewee samples above are not representative of the Alice Springs populacion, but are drawn from those most affected by flooding: people who would be expected to be most incerested in the brochure. Views on the brochure: other groups Broadcast medla The media reD=esenta~ives interviewed were a~are of the I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I brochure, b~~ had not examined it close~y. ~hen asked co do I so, the ger.eral comments were that it ~eeded to be :nore "catchy", and t..o have less writir.g, i.f l~ was to be '..1seful to the General public. The modern cons~mer does not generaliv have to work to obcain informa~io:-t. I I


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.