Flood Warning and Damages in Alice Springs: Part 1 Executive Summary. Part 2 Tangible Damages Part 3 Intangible Damages & Emergency Procedures
Handmer, John; Smith, D. I.; Greenaway, Mark
E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Report ; 53/1989
1989-04-01
Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).
Date:1989-04
English
Power and Water Authority
Alice Springs
Report ; 53/1989
application/pdf.
Check within Publication or with content Publisher.
https://hdl.handle.net/10070/228902
https://hdl.handle.net/10070/673596
Technical Report WRA89053 Viewed at 03:02:00 on 18/02/2010 Page 76 of 139. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 25 WAruiIN(i AND . EMERGENCY RE$PONSE -Cos e paspnnsiD" 1e 0- ~"ood war~lng l"n "lice ~Dr'ngs :--e ---' ~- -, - L.l.. __ _~._ l.l"".. ~ ....... _..l.. l..O' ....... ~~o maj:r problems: li~ited time and limited coverage. The ~~in ga~ge at Wigley Gc~ge on the Todd River provides abcut :~e hour's accurate war~ing of flooding in the city. 2~veral additional hours general warning may be received ~=om the Bond Springs rainfall gauge. There is also a gauge :.:-. 'the Charles River ~ ::owever, the city may also be ~undated by local runc~~ or storm-water drain su~charge for ~~ich t~ere is no warni~g. In this respect the system is ~jpical of those in Aus:ralian urban areas, where seri0us ~:ooding may occur with:ut activa~ion of the warning system. :~us, t~e situation a=ises when gauges are no~ recording ~:ow in the river, but =oads are blocked and d~ains ~~erflc~ing within Alice Springs. The subtleties separati~g ~=ainage!local runoff f~onl riverine flooding are easily ~os~ C~ those being flooded. Ignoring drainage problems may also ~aduce :he credib~lity )f the warning system and related F~blic i~formation. The very limited ~inle available makes effective ~~rnings difficult, and demands that all parts of the system :'.:nctic-n TJl/el.l. The warning syste~ is illustrated in Figure 3.3. Its caSle features are set ~)ur. in &'1nex A to Chapt~:=r 10 of the ?~gional Counter Disas[sr Plan (Region 5). 3ssentially ~':'ood detection is in t':":e hands of PAWA, with serne essistance f~om the Bureau of Meteorology. When a flood ::.?pears likely f?A1'lA infc-r-ms the police who in turn are :esponsible for alerting the Territory Emergency Services Ct!.'ES}. The disaster p~an is then activated by the police ac:d the Counte~ Disaste:- Committee meets to c:)ot"dinate response and implement sub-plans for welfare etc. As far as f~oods are concerned the media a~e not part of the plan. Warnings are conveyed tJ the public by doorknocking. Flood detection T':":e Alice Springs flood detection system has been c:--.aracterised by equipi.l,ent failure~ Entries in the PAr.1A l:g-book highlight the lew reliability of the gauging equipmer:t r power-supplies and communications, and of sa.telite ohotos and tl,e airoort :-adar. In December 1987 all . . t~e gaugi~g equipment f~iled. Failure has occurred in s~ttware and all hardwa~e components. It is worth xentioning that failures cannot be ascribed to long periods c~ equipment inactivity. Although flow in the Todd River is u~usual, the system has been activated because of heavy rain '..I._ numerous occasions G\~ez:- the last several years. Equipment performance was bette~ during the Easter 1?88 flood, but this event showed the limitations of the
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.
We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality. |
You are welcome to provide further information or feedback about this item by emailing TerritoryStories@nt.gov.au