Territory Stories

Nabarlek Pit decommissioning migration of sulphate, nitrate and radium ions in groundwater - preliminary modelling

Details:

Title

Nabarlek Pit decommissioning migration of sulphate, nitrate and radium ions in groundwater - preliminary modelling

Creator

Appleyard, S.

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Report ; 41/1984

Date

1984-04-01

Description

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Notes

Date:1984-04

Language

English

Publisher name

Dept. of Transport and Works

Place of publication

Darwin

Series

Report ; 41/1984

File type

application/pdf.

Copyright owner

Check within Publication or with content Publisher.

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/228496

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/674076

Page content

Technical Report WRD84041 Viewed at 14:07:09 on 29/07/2010 Page 12 of 34. 1-- -----~-~-----,--".- .. ----.-..... I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I_.~~ 5. ESTIMATES OF NITRATE AND SULPHATE LOADS IN COOPER CREEK Unlike the situation for radium, sulphate and nitrate ions are not adsorbed by mineral surfaces to a significant extent and so the transport velocities of these ions are much higher than for Ra. SUlphate and nitrate ions probably move at the same rate as groundwater here. AGC (1984) have estimated that 35 m3/day of water will seep from the pit during rehabilitation, and that groundwater will have a velocity of about 0.02 - 0.6 m/day to the south east. Therefore, the time required for sulphate and nitrate ions to reach Cooper Creek via groundwater transport from the pit will be in the order of 5-140 years. In order to assess the effect of nitrate and sulphate ions seeping into Cooper Creek from the pit, background levels of these ions in Cooper must be knm"n. Total loads of nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite ammonia and organic nitrogen) and SUlphate in loads for the wet seasons between 1978 and 1981 are tabulated below, month of flow. together ,vi th loads carried in the first WET SEl'.50N 1978/79 1979/80 1980/81 TCP.J\L N (xl0 3 Kg) 0.34 2.84 0.73 SlILPFXl'E (xl0 3 kg) 1. 75 16.3 10.42 TGTAL N (xl0 3 kg) 7.70 28.2 2.29 SlT.LPH1'"TE (x10 3 kg) 28.9 66.1 112 The greatest impact that water seeping from the pit could have on Cooper Creek, would be if evaporation during the dry season concentrated soluble nitrate and sulphate salts in creek sediments whioh were then flushed out in the first flow of the subsequent wet season. SA2/11 :TJ W4U~ ,h + --*-- -41,


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.