Alice Springs recreational dam hydrology report project 6
Jackson, D.; Paige, D.
E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Report no. 12/1979
1979-10-01
Date:1979-10
English
Northern Territory Government
Darwin
Report no. 12/1979
application/pdf
Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
Northern Territory Government
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://hdl.handle.net/10070/228346
https://hdl.handle.net/10070/674275
Technical Report WRD79012 Viewed at 00:02:46 on 18/02/2010 Page 126 of 153. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 28 Tables 13 and 14 give the results of the routes for cases (a) and (b) respectivel~ starting conditions being full. Although the attenuation is larger when the starting level is 592.7 metres, it is not significantly larger - for example - case la), 100 year return period flood is discharged as 560 m 3 /s when the starting level is 592.7, compared with 618 m3/s in Table 13. Table 13 INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS OF DAM Case (a) Floods (yrs) Starting Elevation 594m Return Periods Inflow(m 3/s) Discharge (m 3/s) Max. Level 5 350 168 595.7 10 490 251 596.2 20 650 348 596.5 50 850 502 597.0 100 1000 618 597.3 500 1400 951 598.0 M.P .. F. 4620 4274 602.0 Table 15 is an example output of Puli~ Routing calculations. All discharges are in m 3 /s. It serves to illustrate the rapid increase in level water as a flood passes. In this caSe it rises 2.1 metres in 4 hours. For the 100 year return period flood, it rises 3.3 metres in 4 hours. (m)
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.
We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality. |
You are welcome to provide further information or feedback about this item by emailing TerritoryStories@nt.gov.au