Territory Stories

NT drug trends 2005 : findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)

Details:

Title

NT drug trends 2005 : findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)

Collection

Northern Territory drug trends; E-Journals; PublicationNT; NDARC technical report ; no. 243

Date

2006

Description

Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).; This publication contains may contain links to external sites. These external sites may no longer be active.

Notes

Date:2006

Language

English

Subject

Drug abuse -- Northern Territory -- Statistics -- Periodicals; Drug abuse -- Northern Territory -- Periodicals; Drug abuse surveys -- Northern Territory -- Periodicals

Publisher name

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales

Place of publication

Sydney

Series

NDARC technical report ; no. 243

ISBN

0733423469

Copyright owner

Check within Publication or with content Publisher.

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/226817

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/678172

Page content

11 Almost half those able to comment (46%, figure 2) stated that heroin availability had been stable over the six months prior to interview. Twenty-one percent (21%) of those who commented thought that heroin had become more difficult to score over the past six months: this corresponds with the reports of current availability, which show a decrease in the proportion reporting heroin as easy to obtain and an increase in the proportion reporting it as very difficult to obtain. The most common source for scoring heroin remains a friend (75%, Table 6) and no one scored from a dealers home this year. It took a median of 60 minutes to score. Table 6: Usual source and median time for recent score of heroin by IDU, 2004-2005 2004 n=19 2005 n=16 Street dealer 16 19 Dealers home 11 0 Friend 53 75 Mobile dealer 11 1 Gift from friend 11 0 Time to score (median mins) 54 60 Source: IDRS IDU interviews 4.3 Purity Only 28 people could comment on heroin purity. Fifty-four percent of those (Figure 3) rated heroin purity as low, and only one person rated it as high. 2003 figures are not presented as only five people could comment on heroin purity. Figure 3: IDU reports of current purity of heroin in the past six months, 2004-2005 Source: IDRS IDU interviews 19 15 19 44 4 21 4 18 54 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Dont know High Medium Low Fluctuates % ID U c om m en te d 2004 n=27 2005 n=28


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.