Territory Stories

Explanatory Statement Serious Sex Offenders Bill 2013 (Serial 18)

Details:

Title

Explanatory Statement Serious Sex Offenders Bill 2013 (Serial 18)

Other title

Tabled paper 232

Collection

Tabled Papers for 12th Assembly 2012 - 2016; Tabled Papers; ParliamentNT

Date

2013-02-14

Description

Tabled by Johan Elferink

Notes

Made available by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory under Standing Order 240. Where copyright subsists with a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Language

English

Subject

Tabled papers

Publisher name

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice

File type

application/pdf

Use

Copyright

Copyright owner

See publication

License

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00599

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/273551

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/799470

Page content

23 Part 6 - Continuing detention orders - review of final orders Application for review by Attorney-General This clause provides that the Attorney-General must apply to the Supreme Court for a review of a continuing detention order. The hearing for the first review must be completed within two years after the day the order first took effect. There must be subsequent reviews at least every two years while the order continues to have effect, unless the order specifies a shorter period of between one and two years. Clause 65. ) Application for review by detainee This clause provides that a detainee subject to a continuing detention order may, with leave of the Supreme Court, apply to the Supreme Court for the order to be reviewed at any time after the first regular review is completed. Subclause (2) provides that the Supreme Court may grant leave to apply only if satisfied there are exceptional circumstances that relate to the detainee. Subclause (3) clarifies that the detainee has the onus of satisfying the Court that these are exceptional circumstances. Setting day for review hearing This clause provides that the Registrar of the Supreme Court must set a date for a hearing of an application under clause 65 or clause 66 with the date to be set so that the hearing occurs as soon as practicable after the application is made. Victim submissions Clause 66. Clause 67. J Clause 68. This clause provides that when a hearing date is set under clause 67, the Attorney-General must notify the Director of the CVSU who, in turn, must seek victim submissions under clause 83. Supervision report This clause provides that if the Supreme Court sets a hearing date under clause 67, the Attorney-General must notify the Director of Clause 69. 23


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain the names, voices and images of people who have died, as well as other culturally sensitive content. Please be aware that some collection items may use outdated phrases or words which reflect the attitude of the creator at the time, and are now considered offensive.

We use temporary cookies on this site to provide functionality.
By continuing to use this site without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies.