Territory Stories

Weed management plan for gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) : 2010

Details:

Title

Weed management plan for gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) : 2010

Other title

Replaced by Weed management plan for Andropogon gayanus (Gamba Grass) 2014

Creator

Northern Territory. Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Natural Resources Division

Collection

E-Publications; E-Books; PublicationNT; Weed management plan

Date

2010

Description

This Weed Management Plan forms part of a strategic approach to gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) management in the NT, with the overall aim being to mitigate the damage caused by gamba grass in relation to the natural environment, property and infrastructure and public health. A comprehensive weed risk management assessment found gamba grass to be a very high risk weed where potential exists for successful management.

Notes

Made available by via Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).

Table of contents

1. Introduction -- 2. Aim and objectives -- 3. Gamba grass declaration status -- 4. Current distribution -- 5. Management requirements -- 6. Eradication and control methods -- 7. Developing a weed seed spread prevention program -- 8. Tracking progress and judging success -- 9. Support and information for land managers -- Appendix A: Summary of management requirements and related actions – gamba grass in class A/C zone -- Appendix B1: Summary of management requirements and related actions – gamba grass in class B/C zone – small landholdings 20ha or less -- Appendix B2: Summary of management requirements and related actions – gamba grass in class B/C zone – large landholdings of more than 20ha -- Appendix C: Summary of management requirements and related actions – gamba grass in public transport or service corridors -- Appendix D: Suggested gamba grass monitoring report template -- Appendix E: Targets -- List of Figures -- List of Tables

Language

English

Subject

Andropogon gayanus; Control; Gamba grass; Weeds

Publisher name

Northern Territory Government

Place of publication

Palmerston

Edition

2010 edition

Series

Weed management plan

Now known as

Weed management plan for Andropogon gayanus (Gamba Grass) 2014

Previously known as

Weed management plan for gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus) : draft August 2009

Format

iii, 31 pages : colour illustrations and maps ; 30 cm

File type

application/pdf

ISBN

9781921519840

Use

Attribution International 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright owner

Northern Territory Government

License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Related materials

Submission to the review of the Weed Management Plan for Andropogon Gayanus (Gamba grass) 2010

Related links

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/265105 [Weed management plan for Andropogon gayanus (Gamba Grass) 2014]; https://hdl.handle.net/10070/300740 [Weed management plan for Gamba Grass (Andropogon gayanus) - August 2018]

Parent handle

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/804175

Citation address

https://hdl.handle.net/10070/805221

Page content

Weed Management Plan for Andropogon gayanus (Gamba Grass) 14 Chemical control of gamba grass will require at least two treatments within a growing season. The initial treatment of existing mature plants and any seedlings should ideally occur following the onset of initial wet season rains, when there is active growth (usually November to December). A follow up treatment should be undertaken in approximately two to four weeks time. This treatment is necessary to treat plants which may have been missed or newly germinating seedlings. A further inspection of the management area will be required prior to April (when gamba grass is beginning to set seed) to ensure no plants have survived or any seeds have germinated. The introduction or production of any new seeds will mean the plants life cycle will continue and the infestation will persist. The results of a strict chemical control program will become more evident with each application. Continual maintenance is imperative as the introduction or production of any new seeds will enable the infestation to persist. 6.2.3 How to apply herbicide Herbicide should be sprayed over the entire tussock to increase and allow effective uptake, as not all tillers in the tussock are connected. A fine spray with low application pressure enables good coverage of the whole plant. A range of dyes are commonly available where herbicides are sold. These can be used in the spray to identify when herbicide has been applied to the entire tussock. The recommended time of year for spraying includes parts of the wet season, so a wetting agent may be used to reduce the chances of wash-off. To treat large infestation areas, start at the edges and work inwards, gradually reducing infestation size. Linear infestations should also be controlled in a strategic manner. Control of plants high in the catchment should be prioritised. Along transport corridors the outbreaks furthest from major/source infestations should be targeted first, working towards the major infestation to avoid inadvertent spread. 6.2.4 Monitoring results and follow-up Treatment areas must be revisited no less than four weeks after spraying, but prior to seedset in May to ensure the plants are dead. Follow-up control to kill any gamba grass seedlings is to be done for at least three years after treatment, this time period takes into account remaining seeds in the soil which may remain viable for extended periods. Areas are to be checked, as part of an on-going monitoring program, early in each calendar year prior to seed set after eradication is thought to have been achieved. 6.2.5 Mission Grass (Pennisetum polystachion) This same herbicide mix described above is used to kill mission grass. Mission grass may invade areas after local eradication of gamba grass; the two should therefore be managed simultaneously if both grasses are present. 6.3 Non-chemical control 6.3.1 Physical removal Individual plants can be removed by hand or by using a mattock. The entire root mat should be removed and excess soil shaken off the root system to ensure the plant dies. Physical removal is very laborious and may therefore only be effective and/or feasible where plant numbers are limited. For almost all populations, chemical control provides the most efficient management approach available.